Last Activity: 28 September 2012, 3:17 AM EDT
Thanks Given: 0
Hi all,
Now Sun provides a large range of x86 servers and Solaris is running fine on both x86/sparc.
For new projects mainly running Oracle DB on SAN, I am wondering which architecture is best for our new projets.
As we won't go for high end servers (using around 4 or 8 Cpu's par host is fine, clustered arch) what are the advantages of using sparc servers as it's much much more expensive.
- Anybody can tell me pros/cons on both architecture running solaris.
We are thinking using Oracle RAC architecture as well taking advantage of the cheap x86 server to build a N node RAC cluster.
- Do anybody have experienced this solution ?
Thanks for your feedback.
Now Sun provides a large range of x86 servers and Solaris is running fine on both x86/sparc.
For new projects mainly running Oracle DB on SAN, I am wondering which architecture is best for our new projets.
As we won't go for high end servers (using around 4 or 8 Cpu's par host is fine, clustered arch) what are the advantages of using sparc servers as it's much much more expensive.
- Anybody can tell me pros/cons on both architecture running solaris.
We are thinking using Oracle RAC architecture as well taking advantage of the cheap x86 server to build a N node RAC cluster.
- Do anybody have experienced this solution ?
Thanks for your feedback.
Pros and Cons. The advantages of Assembly Assembly can express very low-level things: you can access machine-dependent registers and I/O. That's less true on the x86 architecture than on RISC architectures, and perhaps less true for widely available/free compilers; anyway, for typical C code, GCC is fairly good); And in any case, as.
manifesto |
View Public Profile for manifesto |
Find all posts by manifesto |